Hey there! 👋
Early in my career, I made a rookie mistake.
In a conversation with my manager, I casually said, “I think…”
That small turn of phrase led to a 45-minute lecture on how marketing isn’t about what we think. It’s about data. Data is objective. Data doesn’t have feelings. Data tells us what to do.
At the time, it felt like an odd experience. I had a background in creative industries, an arts degree that trained me in critical thinking, and a natural inclination to pull insights from multiple sources. But here was my manager, telling me that none of that mattered.
I’ve worked in very data-driven teams. There’s a lot of good that comes from it.
- You know what’s working and what’s not.
- You can track ROI and optimise efforts.
- You can decide when to pull the plug on a project.
And, I’ve also seen how an obsession with quantitive data becomes a blocker.
The Problem with Being Too Data-Driven
A “data-driven” approach relies on numbers to guide decisions. The logic is simple: numbers don’t lie, and evidence-based decisions remove bias. In theory, this makes sense.
In practice? It often creates blind spots, tunnel vision, and roadblocks to innovation.
Here’s what I’ve experienced.
- The customer disconnect: I’ve found that teams relying solely on spreadsheets rarely spoke to their customers. The mindset was, “We have all the quantitative data we need. Why waste time on conversations?” I’ll admit, I’ve thought this way too. Digging into data is often easier than running customer interviews. But this approach creates a gap between your insights, campaigns, and the very people you’re trying to reach.
- Analysis paralysis: Too much data can lead to endless debates instead of action. If every decision requires multiple reports, progress slows down.
- The need for instant proof: The typical process I often faced for pitching a new campaign or initiative went as follows: New idea → demand for data proving it will generate leads → no existing data because it’s new → idea shelved. Incredibly frustrating, especially when dated playbooks no longer deliver.
- No room for experience: A rigid focus on data devalues intuition and expertise. Seasoned marketers have years of pattern recognition built through campaigns and customer interactions, but when the dashboard becomes the only source of truth, that experience is ignored.
- Misaligned metrics: I’ve sat through too many meetings where every department had a slightly different interpretation of key metrics. Even worse, shifting definitions of leads, MQLs, and other benchmarks meant that historical data became unreliable, making it harder to track progress or make informed decisions.
- The ‘coldness’ of data: A report might tell you what happened, but it won’t tell you why. And it definitely won’t help you sell an idea internally, because numbers alone don’t inspire.
- The AI factor: AI has made data analysis faster, but these quick insights often lack depth. Over-relying on AI-generated analysis can erode critical thinking, making us more passive about questioning and interpreting results.
Data Informed, Not Data Driven
Instead of being fully data-driven, I’ve found greater success with a data-informed strategy, a balanced blend of quantitative metrics, qualitative insights, and instinct.
In my client work, I like to combine qualitative data sources, such as customer interviews, third-party insights, and direct feedback, with hard metrics to create a comprehensive picture. After all, not everything important can be quantified, especially when it comes to human behaviour and market trends.
It also means giving intuition its due place. Marketing intuition isn’t about guessing. It’s a form of sophisticated pattern recognition developed through experience. When an experienced marketer says, “This approach doesn’t feel right,” they’re often processing countless subtle signals that haven’t yet appeared in the data.
How to Be Data-Informed
A data-informed approach blends numbers with real customer insights and strategic thinking. Here’s how to put it into practice.
- Start with clean data: Before making decisions, ensure your data is reliable. Standardise definitions for key metrics like leads and MQLs, and align teams on what success looks like. Inconsistent data leads to inconsistent strategies.
- Talk to your customers: Quantitative data shows what is happening, but customer conversations reveal why. Interviews, surveys, and feedback loops help fill in the gaps, making strategies more customer-centric.
- Test small, learn fast: When there’s uncertainty, start with a small experiment. A/B tests, pilot campaigns, and quick iterations help validate ideas before full-scale rollout—reducing risk while speeding up decision-making.
- Mix your thinkers: Data should guide decisions, not replace judgment. Teams that blend analytical thinking with creative problem-solving are more adaptable, spotting opportunities that rigid data-driven approaches might miss.
- Make room for creative leaps: Some of the best marketing decisions come from recognising patterns that aren’t yet reflected in the data. Leaving room for strategic risks and experimentation helps teams stay ahead of the curve.
Wrapping up
Data helps us make smarter decisions, but it’s not the whole story. Relying only on numbers can lead to slow decision-making, missed opportunities, and a disconnect from the people behind the data.
Being data-informed means using data as a guide, not a rulebook. It means balancing hard numbers with qualitative insights, industry knowledge, and creative instincts. It means recognising that some of the best marketing decisions come not from a dashboard, but from a conversation with a customer, a pattern you’ve seen before, or an experiment that starts with a hunch.